Microsoft released the SP1 for windows 7 and Server 2008 R2. I can’t find any detail on the exact changes of this release if you know any please let me know.
Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1) is an important update that includes previously released security, performance, and stability updates for Windows 7. SP1 also includes new improvements to features and services in Windows 7, such as improved reliability when connecting to HDMI audio devices, printing using the XPS Viewer, and restoring previous folders in Windows Explorer after restarting.
You can download Standalone updater or you can let windows update to download it for your. If you have more than one PC to install the service pack I recommend you to download standalone version but if you have only one it’s better to use windows update.
More info and download links here.
This tool is made for windows users using any of the following products : iPhone 3G S ( all models ) , iPod Touch 3rd Gen, iPad Wifi and iPad Wifi + 3G.
Just download and install AutoSHSH and you can save your ECID files on your computer. Then upload these files to saurik’s server to make sure you can downgrade your device’s firmware in the future.
MAKE SURE ALL OF YOU SAVE YOUR SHSH FILES FOR THE ABOVE DEVICES BEFORE THE SPIRIT JAILBREAK IS OUT!
Download AutoSHSH here.
Any OSx86 installation guide can seem daunting at first glance, especially when trying to remember cryptic terminal commands and sorting through volumes of misinformation on the web. This guide requires no coding, terminal work, or Mac experience of any kind. You will not need access to a Mac. In fact, it’s easier and faster for me to install Snow Leopard with fully working components on my system than it is to install Windows 7. And more fun. The iBoot + MultiBeast method is designed and tested for any desktop or laptop running the latest line of Intel processors, the Core i3/i5/i7s. I have had reports of success with older machines as well including CoreDuo, Core2Duo, and even Pentium 4. However, AMD processors are not supported.
Any OSx86 installation guide can seem daunting at first glance, especially when trying to remember cryptic terminal commands and sorting through volumes of misinformation on the web. This guide requires no coding, terminal work, or Mac experience of any kind. You will not need access to a Mac. In fact, it’s easier and faster for me to install Snow Leopard with fully working components on my system than it is to install Windows 7. And more fun.
The iBoot + MultiBeast method is designed and tested for any desktop or laptop running the latest line of Intel processors, the Core i3/i5/i7s. I have had reports of success with older machines as well including CoreDuo, Core2Duo, and even Pentium 4. However, AMD processors are not supported.
Continue reading here
“Mighty mouse (bluetooth) cannot be connect to windows on boot camp, What should I do?”
Finally I find the solution. Follow me:
Ok, Now you can go to windows (XP,Vista or 7)
Enjoy using Mighty mouse!
Neowin indicates that Windows 7 Ultimate has already been cracked and activated even before its public release.
A leaked .ISO [from Lenovo] was originally posted on a Chinese forum, which was then downloaded in order for people to get hold of the boot.wim, and in turn retrieving the OEM-SLP key, plus the OEM activation certificate. Microsoft uses the same digitally signed OEM certificate, which has an .xrm-ms extension, as that in Windows Vista. Another point to note is that the key is a master one, which can be used to activate other OEM branded installations, like ones from Dell, HP or indeed Lenovo.
The making of a SDK to develope iPhone Applications on Windows Continues… Devs at WiSDK are making a Windows Compatible SDK for the iPhone [ Official Site of WiSDK ]. The software is still in Alpha testing and will soon get into Beta. Quoted by the makers:
With this tool, you can develop your personal applications. We supply you complete set tools, to realize your projects by the beginning till the end. WiSDK includes an environment of development code, an IDE for design interfaces, an iPhone simulator, and acompiler to prepare your applications for the distribution via platforms as Apple AppStore, Cydia, or the others.
From the Screenshots it looks pretty impressive: Check back here at CaziSoft.com for updates..
a few days ago, a writer on this blog, a very bright fellow posted something about how to install Windows 95 on your iPhone and unlike many previous not working windows, this one worked, though I were having trouble installing it on my iPhone via Mac so I contacted sidarth and he told me how to fix it, while from a remote windows device, you need to enter dpkg – /tmp/bochs.deb after copying the bochs.deb file to /tmp, you should open mobileterminal and enter su root, password is alpine now enter the command dpkg -i /tmp/bochs.deb, it’ll take a while once it completes, reboot now open the bochs app on your springboard and select the windows you want, it is very hard to work with and I get errors in Win 95 though the show off is good!
Yes you read that right.. Windows 95 can now be run on your iPhone.
Curious to check it out?
Follow the instructions below:
Screen Shots:
If you are Windows read text below & if you are MAC just … hehhh!
What started as a massive worm infection of more than 8 million machines earlier this year, and then was whittled down to around 2 million, is now back in the spotlight again. The so-called Conficker worm (a.k.a. Conficker/Downadup) is being billed as the next possible April Fool’s Day threat. Machines infected with the third and latest version of the worm — Conficker.C — are expected to “phone home” and receive their updates on April 1. But security experts say not to expect any major Conficker event on April 1. What’s most perplexing, they say, is that Conficker is still alive and well, despite all of the negative attention it has garnered. Conficker became notorious enough to prompt Microsoft to form the Conficker Cabal, a coalition of security vendors and organizations dedicated to killing it. Microsoft even offered a $250,000 bounty for information that helps in the arrest and conviction of the perpetrators behind Conficker. Although Conficker.C appears to be programmed to run a new algorithm for domain-name generation on April 1, infected machines don’t actually need to check in with command and control, and can get their updates at any time: “It doesn’t really need those domain names to be updated” because it’s peer-to-peer, says Joe Stewart, director of malware research for SecureWorks. “It’s unlikely anything will happen on the first [of April],” says Patrik Runald, chief security advisor for F-Secure, which has been following Conficker for months. “Considering all the attention going on about April 1st, why would they do something that day? The group behind it could as easily do something on April 4th or April 10th.” And most of the infected machines have the older Conficker.B variant, anyway, which isn’t scheduled for activity on April 1, according to F-Secure. But Randy Abrams, director of technical education for ESET, says there’s no way to know for sure at this point what will happen that day. “It could be that it does nothing, and April 1 was a joke, diversion, or aborted plan. Or it could be the launch of a massive spam run, DDoS, or infrastructure attack. We really can’t say,” Abrams says. So why worry about Conficker if it hasn’t really done any visible damage thus far? “Because there are still 1 to 2 million computers out there that are infected, and they could potentially do a lot of harm to the rest of the Internet,” F-Secure’s Runald says. The worm initially hit enterprises hard, but many organizations have been able to clean up their internal machines, thanks to Microsoft’s efforts, as well as the various vendors that released prevention and cleanup tools for Conficker. “We saw it spreading extremely fast within internal networks [at first]. Now it’s a combination of corporate and end users who haven’t patched their computers for whatever reason,” Runald says. But with no official sign that the infected machines are ready to spam or inflict a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, security experts disagree about whether Conficker is a botnet-in-waiting. SecureWorks’ Stewart says he hasn’t witnessed any profit motive or attack activity that would point to a botnet, and F-Secure’s Runald says he’s not ready to call it a botnet yet. ESET’s Abrams, however, argues otherwise: “Conficker is a botnet. It has the ability to be remote-controlled, and is an automated program,” he says. “The signs of botnet activity are that it will look outside for instructions and can download and execute code.” Conficker is not a classic worm due to its botnet-like command-and-control channel. It does propagate like a worm, though, exploiting machines that haven’t installed the MS08-067 Windows patch for Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 systems issued by Microsoft back in October. Conficker’s creators have been cranking out new variants of the worm to evade detection, and infection requires no action on the part of the PC user. Although no one is sure what Conficker is ultimately up to, its creators are obviously not amateurs. “It’s professionally coded, [and] it’s still alive after four months, despite our efforts to kill it,” F-Secure’s Runald notes. “It took us some time to figure out how to remove it fully. They’ve implemented new code continuously, and it uses new technologies that barely have been used before, [like the] MD6 encryption.” Still, more treacherous botnets are out there even if Conficker were to officially launch as a botnet. “Botnets that facilitate identity theft and fraud are more damaging,” SecureWorks’ Stewart says.
What started as a massive worm infection of more than 8 million machines earlier this year, and then was whittled down to around 2 million, is now back in the spotlight again.
The so-called Conficker worm (a.k.a. Conficker/Downadup) is being billed as the next possible April Fool’s Day threat. Machines infected with the third and latest version of the worm — Conficker.C — are expected to “phone home” and receive their updates on April 1.
But security experts say not to expect any major Conficker event on April 1.
What’s most perplexing, they say, is that Conficker is still alive and well, despite all of the negative attention it has garnered. Conficker became notorious enough to prompt Microsoft to form the Conficker Cabal, a coalition of security vendors and organizations dedicated to killing it. Microsoft even offered a $250,000 bounty for information that helps in the arrest and conviction of the perpetrators behind Conficker.
Although Conficker.C appears to be programmed to run a new algorithm for domain-name generation on April 1, infected machines don’t actually need to check in with command and control, and can get their updates at any time: “It doesn’t really need those domain names to be updated” because it’s peer-to-peer, says Joe Stewart, director of malware research for SecureWorks.
“It’s unlikely anything will happen on the first [of April],” says Patrik Runald, chief security advisor for F-Secure, which has been following Conficker for months. “Considering all the attention going on about April 1st, why would they do something that day? The group behind it could as easily do something on April 4th or April 10th.”
And most of the infected machines have the older Conficker.B variant, anyway, which isn’t scheduled for activity on April 1, according to F-Secure.
But Randy Abrams, director of technical education for ESET, says there’s no way to know for sure at this point what will happen that day. “It could be that it does nothing, and April 1 was a joke, diversion, or aborted plan. Or it could be the launch of a massive spam run, DDoS, or infrastructure attack. We really can’t say,” Abrams says.
So why worry about Conficker if it hasn’t really done any visible damage thus far? “Because there are still 1 to 2 million computers out there that are infected, and they could potentially do a lot of harm to the rest of the Internet,” F-Secure’s Runald says.
The worm initially hit enterprises hard, but many organizations have been able to clean up their internal machines, thanks to Microsoft’s efforts, as well as the various vendors that released prevention and cleanup tools for Conficker. “We saw it spreading extremely fast within internal networks [at first]. Now it’s a combination of corporate and end users who haven’t patched their computers for whatever reason,” Runald says.
But with no official sign that the infected machines are ready to spam or inflict a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, security experts disagree about whether Conficker is a botnet-in-waiting. SecureWorks’ Stewart says he hasn’t witnessed any profit motive or attack activity that would point to a botnet, and F-Secure’s Runald says he’s not ready to call it a botnet yet.
ESET’s Abrams, however, argues otherwise: “Conficker is a botnet. It has the ability to be remote-controlled, and is an automated program,” he says. “The signs of botnet activity are that it will look outside for instructions and can download and execute code.”
Conficker is not a classic worm due to its botnet-like command-and-control channel. It does propagate like a worm, though, exploiting machines that haven’t installed the MS08-067 Windows patch for Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 systems issued by Microsoft back in October. Conficker’s creators have been cranking out new variants of the worm to evade detection, and infection requires no action on the part of the PC user.
Although no one is sure what Conficker is ultimately up to, its creators are obviously not amateurs. “It’s professionally coded, [and] it’s still alive after four months, despite our efforts to kill it,” F-Secure’s Runald notes. “It took us some time to figure out how to remove it fully. They’ve implemented new code continuously, and it uses new technologies that barely have been used before, [like the] MD6 encryption.”
Still, more treacherous botnets are out there even if Conficker were to officially launch as a botnet. “Botnets that facilitate identity theft and fraud are more damaging,” SecureWorks’ Stewart says.
[Via darkreading]
